Newport was one of the biggest tobacco companies at the time, and were responsible for many commercials like this one. In the commercial the company sets up the scene of an unhappy man who immediately lights up after he "lights up". They want to portray a sense of happiness that cannot be found anywhere but in one of their cigarettes. They are encouraging smoking in this commercial, which is in line with the mindset of the time. This is a contrast to the anti-smoking push of today's society. In the modern commercial, cigarettes are portrayed as instruments of poor health and sadness. In today's society the push is to eliminate smoking all together. One stark contrast is the use of laughter and the beach to evoke happiness n the 60s commercial, but in the modern commercial they use teenagers/young adults with sunken eyes and decaying bodies. The 1960s commercial wants people to forget about the hazards of smoking and have fun, since that is what the focus was on back then. Now, smoking commercials have made a 360, and they now discourage what was once encouraged and thought to make people happy. 

Overall, well written. You clearly identify the rhetorical argument in the intro and throughout the post. However, it would have been more helpful if you elaborated a little more on each part of stasis theory. Just one more sentence for each part, especially the evaluation/value and consequence parts. Also, I am slightly confused about the commercial. Is it a paper ad or a video ad? If it is a video, providing the link for them would help the reader significantly. Also, linking to Old Newport Cigarette company would have been beneficial.
ReplyDelete-Mary H
I like how you brought up the fact that everyone associates the 1960s with drugs like heroin or LSD but in reality, cigarettes were the drug of choice. I also like how you compared the commercials instead of making them stand alone. I think you also could have mentioned how the modern commercial isn't for tobacco but an anti-smoking campaign since tobacco commercials aren't shown on TV anymore.
ReplyDeleteThis was a good analysis, but it feels less like a rhetorical analysis of each commercial and more of a comparison post. I would elaborate more, on the stasis theory especially, on each commercial separately. Also I loved the modern commercial you chose, it always grosses me out, serving its purpose. It reminded me of MTV's new campaign for ending smoking. MTV shows pictures of celebrities smoking while explaining how those pictures are free advertising for major tobacco companies. Then the commercial ends with a powerful statement about how we could be the generation to stop smoking. Therefore, not only does MTV reach out to our generation, but also older celebrities, urging them to stop smoking, at least in public, so that they can set a better example for us.
ReplyDeleteI like how you mention that the commercial is intended to relate smoking cigarettes to happiness. I wonder if this evokes a stronger or weaker reaction from the viewer than the modern day commercial that uses fear of health risks as its main argument.
ReplyDeleteAre you paying more than $5 / pack of cigs? I'm buying all my cigs from Duty Free Depot and I save over 70%.
ReplyDelete