The creator of our
1960s cigarette advertisement is obviously Newport, manufactured by the
Lorillard tobacco company, which markets its product solely for the goal of monetary gain. The most important thing to note about the ethos Newport establishes in this commercial is that its position is completely one-sided. Intrinsically, the commercial presents a beautiful, happy couple on television who serve as an example of the positive outcomes of smoking Newport cigarettes.
To the average Joe lazing on his couch, the woman represents the benefits he can reap, specifically, attention from the opposite sex. The camera shots even seem to zone in on her most often, emphasizing her importance to the commercial's argument that cigarettes will bring consumers all they desire. (It is worth noting that the man
watching the commercial-inside-a-commercial
has a wife, but that he appreciates the attention from the Newport woman since his own is upstairs, ignoring him. He is bored and she represents a temporary fun fantasy she can help him partake in.)


Extrinsically, we know that Newport is trying to sell its audience a product, therefore its motive leads it to conveniently leave out the negative effects of smoking. Modern-day tobacco advertisements are slightly less biased, by law, anyway, since they address the other side of the argument. All
tobacco advertisements since the mid-60s have been banned from television and have required a Surgeon General's warning about the harmful health effects of tobacco use. The 1960s advertisement could have mentioned these risks, refuting them by arguing that it's more important to enjoy oneself in the moment than to worry about the future. Equally, they could have chosen a comedic route, addressing the social risks of tobacco use--perhaps by revealing that smoking alienated the man's wife somewhat, although he might ultimately prove to find that quite a relief.
I agree with your argument: the purpose of the ad was to show that smoking can take your life from boring and dull to fun and exciting. It may even bring you the attention you think you deserve. There is no consideration for the other perspective, the side that shows smoking can cause lung disease, cancer, and even death. By ignoring this perspective, the ad loses some of its persuasive power because it does not morally consider the alternative viewpoints. People who know the health risks would not be persuaded by this commercial, but it was definitely designed to target a neutral audience and introduce them to the happy lifestyle cigarettes can bring.
ReplyDelete